Research universities
At institutional scale the constraint is rarely finding opportunities. It is choosing between them, and getting the right internal team behind the right one before the deadline.
A research university does not have a funding problem in the sense a startup does. It has a portfolio problem: more open solicitations than it can credibly answer, limited submissions that force a choice between strong internal candidates, centre-scale opportunities that need coordination across departments, and a research development office that is usually smaller than the demand on it. Our work is at that level — which competitions are genuinely winnable, which internal team is the credible one, and where the institution's federal relationships are worth spending.
What is different here
Limited submissions
When an agency caps applications per institution, the internal competition matters more than the external one. Choosing wrong costs a cycle.
Centre-scale coordination
Large centre awards need several departments, a credible management plan and often external partners aligned months before submission.
Research development capacity
Most offices are stretched. Outside capacity is worth most on the strategic decisions, not on formatting.
Federal relationships
Institutional standing with programme officers and delegations is an asset that decays without maintenance.
Relevant practice areas
Common questions
How do you help with limited submission competitions?
By assessing which internal candidate is most competitive against that specific solicitation, rather than which is most senior or most persistent. That is a judgement institutions often find easier to accept from outside.
Do you work with our research development office or replace it?
Alongside it. The office knows the institution; the value we add is federal-side — what a programme is actually trying to buy this cycle, and what has changed since the last one.
Can we pay your fees from a grant?
Generally not from the award you are applying for. Pre-award proposal costs and costs of influencing an award are treated as unallowable in the ordinary case, which is why engagements are institutionally funded and fee-based.
Related reading
- Why paying a grant consultant a percentage of your award is a problemSuccess fees on federal grants are generally unallowable, and the exposure falls on the grantee rather than the consultant. What the rules actually say.
- Most strong proposals fail on fit, not on scienceProgramme selection decides more outcomes than proposal quality does. How agencies differ, and why the choice has to be made before anything is written.